tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24032827.post8818131832614974173..comments2023-05-02T00:35:12.997-07:00Comments on Things of No Interest: June 3, 2007 - SamuraiThings of No Interesthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09613123851070841897noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24032827.post-66120983792789112612007-06-05T06:34:00.000-07:002007-06-05T06:34:00.000-07:00What I like about Samurai is that the game is pret...What I like about Samurai is that the game is pretty different depending on 2, 3, or 4 players. The approach and concerns are just different enough to make the game interesting in all approaches.Things of No Interesthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09613123851070841897noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24032827.post-36697090376795571562007-06-04T11:47:00.000-07:002007-06-04T11:47:00.000-07:00Oh, and I'm not sure you had the win for sure... I...Oh, and I'm not sure you had the win for sure... I believe that if you'd messed up my two-piece win over on the left, I would have guaranteed myself a rice over on the right and we might have tied. Or not, not certain.Matthew Frederickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11313457179703695295noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24032827.post-85102797366602128762007-06-04T11:46:00.000-07:002007-06-04T11:46:00.000-07:00One thing I quite liked about it is needing to ser...One thing I quite liked about it is needing to seriously consider that one of us might get two majorities, making the piece count unimportant, and therefore needing to either (a) constantly ensure that I could match you in all pieces, or (b) aggressively going after only two types. The former is safer, though, so maybe all games play out that way.<BR/><BR/>Thanks, it was fun!Matthew Frederickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11313457179703695295noreply@blogger.com